Wabbit Season by MeatCanyon (2020)

Full Cast & Crew

1) Writing Credits (in alphabetical order)

Casey Gunderson	…	(writer)
Jim Martin	…	(devised in collaboration with)
Fadde Mikhail	…	(devised in collaboration with)
NationOfOranges696	…	(devised in collaboration with)
Jerome Simpson	…	(written under the supervision of)

2) Produced by

Samantha Boissonneault	…	line producer
Christine Côté	…	executive producer
Andrea Gorfolova	…	executive producer
Hunter Hancock	…	executive producer
Rick Morrison	…	executive producer
Ashley Rite	…	executive producer

3) Art Department

Karine Charlebois	…	storyboard artist
Brandon DuBose	…	storyboard artist
Jeanette Hernandez	…	storyboard artist (as Janette Hernandez)
Eric Nussbaumer	…	storyboard artist (as Erik Nusbaumer)
Amélie Sakelaris	…	storyboard revisionist

4) Visual Effects by

Molly Wright

…

vfx compositor

5) Animation Department

Tinky Chow	…	layout artist
Serge Gavanski	…	background painter
Jenna Gien	…	animator: Big Jump
Jonathan Hitchcock	…	animator: Big Jump
Jeffery Ho	…	background artist
Jason Khober	…	animation revisionist: Big Jump
Vimmy Kilcullen	…	animator
Terry Lenko	…	background painter
Matthew R. Little	…	animation director: Big Jump
Jeremy Mess	…	animator
Michelle Moger	…	animator: Big Jump
Stevenson Padmore	…	animator: Big Jump
Jon Rom	…	animator: Big Jump
Sierra Saura	…	lead animator
Keith Doc Savage	…	character and prop rigging: Big Jump
Vinay Singh	…	character and prop rigging: Big Jump
Jeff Snider	…	compositor: Big Jump
Marc Soogrim	…	character and prop rigging: Big Jump
Laura Elizabeth Tryon	…	character and prop rigging: Big Jump
Marsha Tull	…	animator: Big Jump
Ryan Van Eyk	…	animator: Big Jump
Clivia Vialva	…	character and prop rigging: Big Jump
Craig Yamamoto	…	assistant animator
Salome Yeung	…	layout artist

6) Editorial Department

Jacob Keith Bristol	…	animatic editor (as Jacob Clyde Bristol)
King Demomdias	…	assistant editor
Vincent McDermott II	…	animatic editor
Patryk Stadnikiewicz	…	post-production coordinator
Morgan C. Winter	…	vision mixer

7) Additional Crew

Jerome Simpson

…

executive story editor

 

Canonised Depiction of Bugs Bunny

I have seen that this Wikipedia article for Bugs bunny excludes one specific portrayal of Bugs Bunny from mid-2020. The depiction was available in an animated YouTube video. Yet, unlike different recordings on YouTube that portray Bugs Bunny (For instance, parodies), this video is possessed by Warner Bros studio and is the protected innovation of Warner Bros.

While Bugs Bunny’s portrayal inside this video unfathomably differentiations to his recently seen notoriety, Warner Bros’ responsibility for video consecrates the occasions portrayed in this video, regardless of Warner Bros the video animated. This has caused a lot of contention, as many were disappointed with Warner Bros’ choice to authoritatively address Bugs Bunny’s famous person in such an indecent way.

Hunter August Hancock, broadly referred to via online media as Meatcanyon

This video was composed and animated by an outside illustrator named Hunter August Hancock, broadly referred to via online media as Meatcanyon, toward 2020. While Hancock composed and animated this video that portrays Bugs Bunny’s personality, he isn’t associated with Warner Bros; it has freely settled that he doesn’t possess the video.

The video portrays various characters from the Looney Tunes establishment, including Bugs Bunny and his enemy, Elmer J. Fudd. In this video, Bugs Bunny moves toward the notable hare tracker character in a physically overbearing way. On a chain of occasions, these outcomes uncover Bugs Bunny as a striving attacker. The video has been taken out from YouTube because the video infringed on YouTube’s people group principles. However, various other YouTube clients reuploaded it.

Meatcanyon’s YouTube channel

You can find more data on YouTube, via looking through Meatcanyon’s YouTube channel, or via looking through the name of the video, “Wabbit Season” Shakespeare Mcdude (talk)

Warner Bros Claimed Copyright Case on Meatcanyon’s videos

Warner Bros. bringing down something for infringing on their copyright doesn’t “sanctify” it. Take your shitposting somewhere else.

Warner Bros didn’t have the power to take responsibility for a parody. Parodies utilize protected works for purposes that reasonable use was intended to secure, laid out in Section 107 of the Copyright Act. The way that they did implies that they asserted responsibility for the character being referred to, and affirmed that the portrayed person was, indeed, the genuine bugs rabbit character, and connected the person with the occasions that had occurred in the video, making the occasions of the video ordinance to Bugs Bunny’s personality. Shakespeare Mcdude (talk) 15:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC).

Twitter users reaction:

@Shakespeare Mcdude:

First: Warner Bros. getting YouTube to bring down a video doesn’t mean Warner Bros. “claims” the video; it implies that YouTube thought keeping it up would be more complicated than it was worth. Reasonable use or not, WB can demand anything to bring it down, and YouTube can bring down anything it needs.

Second: By your rationale, I could make a video showing Winnie the Pooh as a killer and Disney getting it brought down from whatever site would make it “standard.” Canon is whatever the creator/proprietor concludes it is. Trivial (talk) 17:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC).

Assuming the person in Meatcanyons video is the genuine, real bugs rabbit character, then, at that point, it would be an ordinance. So if it wasn’t the natural person, then, at that point, it isn’t standard.

if Warner Bros had the video brought down when It did exclude the natural person, then, at that point, that is a fake case of copyright proprietorship, which Warner Bros could hypothetically be sued for based on a robbery of licensed innovation.

As I said previously, Warner Bros didn’t have the position to take responsibility for parody. Shakespeare Mcdude (talk) 17:46, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

A debt of gratitude is for not perusing my past remark. My problem for attempting to persuade somebody whose main Wikipedia alters are to this conversation. Trivial (talk) 20:09, 10 December 2020 (UTC).

Conclusion

I read all remark, and I considered all that you said. I just contended that assuming this video doesn’t contain the valid person, then, at that point, Warner Bros doesn’t reserve any option to make such a case against it, nor should YouTube make any move against it dependent on copyright encroachment.